App Mounting Pattern

Local space mounting

Standalone app server, referenced by the mount resource

Option 3 is supporting both mounting patterns

Local Only Agents and Apps

When do you want a local app?

You want it to work offline

You don't want to share some secrets with a server

It sounds like we don't need local apps, for now!

Apps and Agents Permission

We want permissions to be driven by normal hypermedia caps, regardless of mounting pattern

If you can:

write to a space (mount resource)

the server is configured to do so,

Then the app will be instantiated and mounted!

SSO Enterprise Requirement

Probably a vault sign-in workflow

Anthropic API SSO, Google/Gemini maybe too?!

Fine-Grained Permissions

You can't be granted access to part of a resource. Design your resources so that privacy permissions are partitioned

Broken Cmd-A in most text inputs

@Untitled Contact will fix some of these

New Agent Workflow

Ion Notifs in Discord

Ion will now send STT updates to #dev-notifs channel

Cross-Vault Identity Project

In the EE, there is a desire to have shared identities. Lets wait for keyline project to complete, and we can clean up the EE privacy features

Do you like what you are reading? Subscribe to receive updates.

Unsubscribe anytime

Connections0

Connections show where other documents or comments link to this document.

Related documents

Loading connections…