Before I reoriented so as to include Bitcoin into my worldview, my time preference was so low 'I didn’t care' about money. I’d heard of Bitcoin years prior, but didn’t go down the rabbit hole because I just couldn’t imagine how a new form of money might be of service to my desire to live in a more just and loving world.
I was coming from a concern that despite our modern infrastructure, communication between hostile superpowers felt like the risk and suspicion of the prisoner’s dilemma. And all of this in the context of exponential technology becoming a ‘multipolar trap’ where the incentives are to do quickly and unilaterally what ought to be approached carefully and cooperatively.
In the legacy broadcast paradigm that’s presided over us and brought us to this point, communication was tantamount to authoritative messaging. Meanwhile, down my own rabbit hole, the communication 'best practices' I found showed me that ‘conflict only exists at the level of strategy, meanwhile we all have the same human needs’1. This underlying shared reality is a basis for new conversations that create a world that can work for everyone, just as in hyperbitcoinization we share a common denominator across which to trade.
Humanity hasn't dealt with the unworkability of its communication. This is the original (and persisting) human alignment problem. I see this clearly in the history of tragedies in politics and war.
We can begin to see in this the playing field for a new game theory of communication (& hence Bitcoin adoption) - an environment in which one cannot avoid feedback. If I publish a false claim, anyone can quote it with their own response to it. When you’re reading my assertion, their comment will be right there. I can add feedback to their feedback, and perhaps I was correct after all - now we’ve got a clarification that deepens my point. Such ongoing recontextualization is the warp and woof powerful articulations - if only I was publishing this into such an integrous platform, I would learn how to make it clear to you!
The key specific element I don't see represented in the Git process is an issue Nelson didn’t have to face: in a permissionless system, how do you deal with the potential incoming spam of others quoting your writing? Having to lock up sats to maintain a transclusion? I believe such a mechanism is possible without resorting to some trusted moderator or reputation system. This is how I see Hyperbitcoinization being realized, as the outcome of best practices being practiced.
1 This is the core insight of Marshall Rosenberg’s Nonviolent Communication
2 Project Xanadu is unavoidably the original vision for hypertext since Ted coined the term, “hypertext”